[esnacc-dev] [PATCH] cxxlib: Add ROSE definitions

[Sagara Wickramasekara]

letting it stand rather than rebasing is fine by me

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Aaron Conole <aconole at bytheb.org> wrote:

> Aaron Conole <aconole at bytheb.org> writes:
>
> > From: Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>
> >
> > This commit adds an initial implementation of the Remote Operations
> Service
> > Element (ROSE) to the esnacc compiler.  This is based on work
> contributed by
> > estos GmbH.  This initial implementation does not have compiler support.
> > It is merely the library portion for the C++ library.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole at bytheb.org>
> > CC: Stephen Eckbauer <ste at estos.de>
> > ---
>
> So, in my haste, I pushed this up.  I can either rebase master, or we
> can let it stand in the repo.  If I rebase, that is a history rewrite,
> so I'd prefer to skip it.
>
> Thoughts?
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at lists.esnacc.org
> http://mail.esnacc.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>



-- 
-Sagara
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.esnacc.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20170629/3f0a6912/attachment-0002.html>