[esnacc-dev] [PATCH] cxxlib: Add ROSE definitions

[Aaron Conole]

Wow - two responses to a patch in short order.  I can't ignore the will
of the community :).  Therefore...

We now have a start to a ROSE library.  Huge thanks to Stephen and the
developers at estos for the initial work.  I hope that the rest of the
work makes it into 1.9 for this year's release.

-Aaron

Uri Blumenthal <uri at mit.edu> writes:

> +1. Let it stand.
>
>  On Jun 29, 2017, at 07:48, Sagara Wickramasekara <sagaraw at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  letting it stand rather than rebasing is fine by me
>
>  On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Aaron Conole <aconole at bytheb.org> wrote:
>
>  Aaron Conole <aconole at bytheb.org> writes:
>
>  > From: Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>
>  >
>  > This commit adds an initial implementation of the Remote Operations Service
>  > Element (ROSE) to the esnacc compiler.  This is based on work contributed by
>  > estos GmbH.  This initial implementation does not have compiler support.
>  > It is merely the library portion for the C++ library.
>  >
>  > Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole at bytheb.org>
>  > CC: Stephen Eckbauer <ste at estos.de>
>  > ---
>
>  So, in my haste, I pushed this up.  I can either rebase master, or we
>  can let it stand in the repo.  If I rebase, that is a history rewrite,
>  so I'd prefer to skip it.
>
>  Thoughts?
>  _______________________________________________
>  dev mailing list
>  dev at lists.esnacc.org
>  http://mail.esnacc.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>  -- 
>  -Sagara
>  _______________________________________________
>  dev mailing list
>  dev at lists.esnacc.org
>  http://mail.esnacc.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at lists.esnacc.org
> http://mail.esnacc.org/mailman/listinfo/dev