From sagaraw at gmail.com  Mon Nov 13 11:59:08 2017
From: sagaraw at gmail.com (Sagara Wickramasekara)
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 06:59:08 -0500
Subject: [esnacc-discuss] xsltproc - required?
Message-ID: <CAJ6ekXWZ_g1YZxYo3CxweZp6RnA5ZYU0HnHm_GVss6wPkimu_Q@mail.gmail.com>

With the commit to allow the build to function in the absence of xsltproc,
thoughts on removing it from the required section of INSTALL.md?

-- 
-Sagara
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.esnacc.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20171113/cf444b71/attachment.html>

From aconole at bytheb.org  Mon Nov 13 15:02:31 2017
From: aconole at bytheb.org (Aaron Conole)
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 10:02:31 -0500
Subject: [esnacc-discuss] xsltproc - required?
In-Reply-To: <CAJ6ekXWZ_g1YZxYo3CxweZp6RnA5ZYU0HnHm_GVss6wPkimu_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 (Sagara Wickramasekara's message of "Mon, 13 Nov 2017 06:59:08 -0500")
References: <CAJ6ekXWZ_g1YZxYo3CxweZp6RnA5ZYU0HnHm_GVss6wPkimu_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f7tinee6x2w.fsf@dhcp-25-97.bos.redhat.com>

Sagara Wickramasekara <sagaraw at gmail.com> writes:

> With the commit to allow the build to function in the absence of xsltproc, thoughts on removing
> it from the required section of INSTALL.md?

I think it makes sense to remove it from the required section.  Perhaps
it's time to introduce an optional dependencies section.